🚀Free Football Trading Strategy Masterclass: https://sportstradinglife.com/strategymasterclass
⚽️Football Trading Simulator Waiting List: https://sportstradinglife.com/gz2l
We take a closer look at trading Over 2.5 Goals on Betfair and most notably the very BEST strategy for trading Over 2.5 Goals.
Many who are new to this get confused about the best approach and so in this video I will show you the BEST approach and then actually compare the results to other approaches so you know for sure.
Don’t miss this!
🚀Free Football Trading Strategy Masterclass: https://sportstradinglife.com/strategymasterclass
—————- SPORTS TRADING LIFE LINKS ——
Website: https://sportstradinglife.com/
📕 Download the “Cash Out Handbook” for FREE: https://sportstradinglife.com/cashout
Twitter: https://twitter.com/followSTL
—————————————————————————————
Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. The risk of loss in trading can be substantial, carefully consider the inherent risks of such an investment in light of your financial condition. The content in this video is for entertainment purposes only.
I've trialed this for six consecutive days; covered 18 games; lost money in two and returned on 16. A return of 23%. Small stakes only and cashed out immediately the first goal went in. I could have held on for more but wanted to get a worst case scenario. Very low maintenance strategy, and easy to duck in and out of on my mobile. No time consuming research – I just went with the games where the odds on over 2.5 were shorter than under 2.5. My go to, simple strategy.
Great video, Ben. Many thanks
Wouldnt it be better to 'back under 2.5' for the first part of the match, and then after the 10 minute mark start on the 2.5? My bad if it sounds moronic, but I'm just starting with this. I've made profit on close to 90% of the trades with backing under 2.5 with the start of most matches
What if, to do the same thing on the over 1,5 Goals market?
Si può avere una traduzione italiana?
N=1
Well explained I think I'll give that a twirl… Was looking for a way into trading and this looks like a good one to start with . 👍
This strategy is fine because you will get a better value as the price increases when there is no goals. This is a no brainer 😆😆 Thanks for those Tennis videos am now conflicted between Football and Tennis 😆😆 This is the best Trading #Channel on YouTube. Am a Football Trading #Pro, I never considered Tennis until those videos. So thanks again and keep up the #Outstanding work…….#Bless you 👊👊
There is no value in dripping. When you drip in you increase long term volatility, that's it. If you do your bets in stages you forget that if goal comes in after first drip… you get profit from 33% of your stake and not from 100% of your stake. So essentially – early goal (after first drip) – less profit.. and later goal like in this video – more profit, opposing to 100% straight bet in from the start. Trading is "advanced betting" and nothing else. There is no difference between betting and trading – only that you can "specify" your bet to your needs.. like in this case guessing there will be a goal soon.. . This trade is no different to betting on over 0.5 goals or drip feeding if you like more volatility and fun. Btw why there is no live chat anymore on UFT?
The problem with dripping in your entry is that a proportion of your winners will only be partially matched, but ALL of your losers will be fully matched.
Thanks for the video Ben. I really enjoy your videos and get a heck of a lot of learning out of them ! Cheers
dripping will always lead to more profit,as long as your game is going to have goals
A couple of quick questions for you, Ben:
How long did it take you to become profitable? And what was the turning point for you?
Hey Ben, great content and appreciate the efforts mate. One question about trading software…which ladder interface software would you recommend or do you use? Which software..geeks toy or angel..etc does your course support??
These strategies always sound really good, and the winning examples are great. But I just can't understand how they can be profitable in the long run. As one loss is significantly greater, so just wipes out any profits.
I'm a member of UFT but Betfair banned my country and account 🙁
And Chelsea has just scored again in the 66th minute but i would of been insane to hold my position 😉
Great idea Ben, tried this on 2 matched this evening, 30% Profit on the first trade and a scratch trade on the 2nd match, both goals went in minutes after the 2nd half, I'm 100% behind the dripping method, even if you dont manage to get your full stake in position your reward to risk % should be the same as this means an early goal has been netted before you could put your final trade on around 20-25mins mark, ok you dont make as much money but a loss is worse. And by dripping your bets at higher and higher odds as times passes they will average out anyway and provide a profit providing you get a recent goal, I agree with alot of the below comments about an exit strategy and to be honest im very suprised you didnt touch on this as you do in most of the videos ive watched of yours.
The Chelsea v Leicester match tonight, 2 goals not allowed, i was teased twice with a goal and in the end cashed out when Chelsea scored in the 46th minute for a 50p profit, was in the red £7.77 during half time, drip betting £5 each on the 10th, 15th and 20th minutes.
Thanks for the video, although my personal opinion in calling this 'the most profitable method confirmed!' is inaccurate, and potentially misleading. Why? Because (a) this was a sample size of 1 game, and (b) you were lucky when the goal was scored, right after your third drip back. Had the goal gone in in min 11 you would have made 3 times the profit if you have backed your full stake at min 10 compared to a drip back. In other words, it all depends on when the goal is scored.
In order to validate your title statement, you would need to take hundreds of games as a sample size, and then we would have the answer. I get that drip backing buys you some time, but that benefit is offset if a relatively early goal is scored. My guess is there's probably not much in it, but happy to be proven wrong on a big sample.
I like this approach, looks like it is more viable than the traditional 100% stake from outset…..cheers.
Can i ask something please?
3:30 why didnt you just lay over 2.5 @ 1.47. The back price will rise above the ley over time and can green out.
Why would back bet it later on… then lay the bet when it scores?
Can you drip the lay?